
Aaron Dignan on being complexity conscious and people positive
...Lisa Gill: Two of the little phrases that I really liked in the book were complexity conscious and people positive. What do those terms mean to you? Can you say something about what those phrases represent? Aaron Dignan: Yeah, so when...more
...nough reinforcement - so I think that's the people positive side. That's sort of at the root of all the humanistic thinking about work. And then the complexity conscious was really more about the systemic understanding. So, you know, in systems theory, there are lots of different kinds of systems - simple sy...more
...y more about the systemic understanding. So, you know, in systems theory, there are lots of different kinds of systems - simple systems, complicated, complex, chaotic, disordered, etc. We really, as a culture, think about everything as complicated. So, you know, a watch is complicated, an engine is complic...more

Bill Fischer and Simone Cicero on Haier and the entrepreneurial organisation
...act basically. Instead, the Taoist perspective is really individual — it’s focused on the individual. And it’s really about how we engage with such a complex world that goes beyond our capacity to understand it. And I think when you relate this powerful mix of individual capabilities and for example, the w...more
...back.
But Haier is 70,000 real people making real things. And so for me, it’s a wonderful, wonderful opportunity to talk about how you change large, complex organisations in mature industries.
And the leadership. The leadership, of course is extraordinary. So those two things, I think are what differenti...more
...— you kind of create the culture by designing these constraints.
And this is something that is quite recurring. **I think, when you deal with really complex organisations, they’re mostly managed by constraints. And this is an expression of complexity in general. When you need to manage a complex system, y...more

Keith McCandless and Henri Lipmanowicz on acting your way into a new kind of organising with Liberating Structures
...r he retired, and we are both pretty practical. We were listening to mathematicians and physicists and biologists and ecologists, got inspired by the complexity science thinking, and then we went out and started doing things and people were doing things with that. And saying, you know, you have got to write t...more
...ders of an institute - and I mean, Keith was very much at the centre of that too - called Plexus Institute, that was devoted to spreading ideas about complex systems, you know, and the notion that you could use those ideas and those concepts as a way of organising, you know, as a way of running organisations. And...more
...d use those ideas and those concepts as a way of organising, you know, as a way of running organisations. And so the idea was that organisations are complex systems, they're not machines. And therefore we shouldn't run them like machines, you know. That they are not controllable, or hierarchical systems don't rea...more

Gary Hamel on busting bureaucracy for good
...solution. First of all, I would argue that if the goal is to uninstall bureaucracy or move to a post-bureaucratic organisation, this is going to be a complex, multistage redesign. Bureaucracy (at least as practiced in a modern company), emerged over quite a considerable time - probably 50 or 60 years from ...more
...e years later, still, essentially an autocratic society. So any approach to solving this problem first of all has to be emergent just because of its complexity and the amount of new things we have to invent. And secondly, you have to find a way of going around those who have a vested interested in just stall...more

Margaret Heffernan on how to act our way out of the status quo trap
...hing that changes everything. I don't think there is- I think that's a mythical beast, right? The organisations that we mostly work in are enormously complex, and one single thing or one single idea doesn't change everything. But I think that the the advantage of self management is that it makes much clea...more

Amy Edmondson on psychological safety and the future of work
...
Risk-taking by definition is going to involve some things going well, but some things not going well. That’s part of work in a volatile, uncertain, complex, ambiguous world. Things will go well and not well at different times, and not always in a predictable way. So the Learning Zone, it’s a little bit l...more

Beetroot’s founders on purpose, self-management, and shocking people with trust
...ve been trying to structure that like, this is when you should do this, and this is when you should do that. But you come to the conclusion that it's complex. So it's more about getting everyone in to think about being aware of these things, and all that's under development I would say, like the whole cons...more

Miki Kashtan on the three shifts needed for self-managing organisations to thrive
...ou've written about and explored at length as well. And, again, I think in self managing systems, this is another total paradigm shift. And it's more complex I'm learning than just "let's change this manager-subordinate power dynamic." There's so many other power dynamics and relationships to power that ar...more

Margaret Wheatley on leadership and Warriors for the Human Spirit
... for us - if we're paying any attention - we're not in our cocoons, it creates an environment where we have to know how to deal with these very deep, complex emotions. So that's part of the training - not to ignore them or disallow them but to act from them. And another component of the training is we wan...more